Blessed, banished and condemned
Blessed or banished which difference? All depends on the author of this sanction, according to his beliefs, his mood or its interest. For the same act one can blessed or banished. Pascal was had not formulated his famous sentence: truth in on this side, error beyond?
Here are some examples to illustrate this matter; Let us take initially the example of the family relations between parents and children. The problems which emerge in the family institution are resulting of several factors of which in particular the economic and social level of the family.
A family of bottom grade faces problems due to ignorance and poverty. The child as of his youth is divided between his duty to obey his parents, to accept their living condition to satisfy them and he will be blessed, or to revolt against this situation while risking to be banished. On the other hand the parents of a high level is taken so much by their professional projects and their engagements which they leave the children delivered to themselves believing that they do not miss anything, being well nourished, equipped well and entrusted to excellent teachers, whereas they miss with the fact of more important than the material aspect: they miss love and affection. The consequences of these deprivations can be dramatic. In much of case, the children are victims' bad companies involving them with the delinquency. The parents rather tardily discover the drifts of their children and the fact of banishing them is not of any utility.
We take another example on the level of the international relations: The possession of the nuclear weapons is a right, a strategic need, an eloquent means of dissuasion, as it acts of a great power.
It is on the other hand a violation with the international law which necessities sanction by all the means, including the use of the force and why not the recourse to the weapon precisely prohibited? , Thus the great power is blessed, but the emergent state is non-believer, therefore it is necessary to banish it and condemn it. Why? Because it is still at the stage which is equivalent in the human being to adolescence. Can one thus banish and to condemn a great power when it transgresses the international law like it makes it often and openly? Then for what would be used the right of veto, true average of hegemony and injustice, devoting two weights and two measurements This right of veto leonine brings back us in a gregarious state of humanity, with the law of the jungle. The recent history also teaches us on men who can be blessed then banished and condemned. You know some of them certainly. The majority of them are soldiers, of alleviating career, which one can promote supreme chief, established with brass band. One consolidates his regime, one arms it to the teeth; and one entrusts to him the role of gendarme of the area and of rampart against any danger so it is. Very well chief, mission accomplished, you became salts undesirable dictator, enemy of humanity, to banish, condemn and crush. God is blessed