Should we take the bible Literally? Should we believe in something
that has been passed through hundreds of years of mortal men and greedy kings? The bible itself was written by mere man, inspired by in its depth a higher and more powerfully wise being. Yet the Bible, although divine in its meaning, was in fact an imperfect verse in a poem meant to be somewhat different than what we today believe. Is it possible that men do not care what God meant us to know? Thousands of Texts have been split through and divided during the latter years of the middle ages, destroyed in all its original text and replaced by a sort of written favoritism due either in part to religion or politics. Could the Bible have passed along this tragic and idealistic venture?
These days we are
beginning to understand and learn that there are other texts, other gospels and accounts that were left out of the bible to suit the early christians'' idea of who God is, and how Jesus was, how he came to be and what he taught them while he was alive. Is there more to what the books of Revelation, Proverbs, Genesis, and most other written words seem to tell us according to modern religion? Even so much as the beginning of the universe itself and the creator, who''s name literally means "One who causes to become", of which had to have lived forever in an eternal paradox. Who is God? What does the Bible mean to tell us? What is the
Forbidden fruit of which "Eve" had been so eagerly seduced into "Partaking" of? Could there be more to what that forbidden fruit actually is?