“The not
tags' onclick="javascript:counttag('Divine', 1, 1755055)"; href="/tags/divine/">
divine Comedy” of Zygmunt Krasińskiego tells history of the revolution directed against the aristocracy. The author contained {contracted} in the composition its own prowidencjalne opinions concerning of the part of the gentleman′s layer in instituted by
God &
lt;/tags/of the god/&
gt; the philosophy of history order. They linked {referred} to the Hegelian triad , however as opposed to the opinion Hegla, the resultant conflict among the aristocracy and
revolutionists he had to bring {to lead} to the total disaster. Given fragment of the work Krasińskiego is a dialogue among the representative of the aristocracy – a
count Henry, and the leader of revolutionists - To Pancrases. The conversation sets up calmly, the Husband thanking for the confidence accepts the guest amicably {friendship}. Pancras soon brings to light her own reluctance to historic layers with the contempt bearing upon pendant in the room of coats of arms. The leader of mutineers is an idealist, believes in the possibility of the creation of other, considerably better world </tags/%C5%9Bwiata/> from this which knows. It attends that the guilty {viny} nobility is to this, that the most people </tags/of people/> in the world lives penniless and the poverty which is a reason of their unhappy life. The count instead, affirms that the authority which he possesses his state is descended from God, so the mankind cannot her call in question. The husband addresses Pancras “the citizen-God′s” treating him with like the false prophet, bringing the people on the misway. The superiority of revolutionists was considerable, and their victory over the nobility close {near}, because the interlocutor of the Count </tags/of the count/> was very much self-confident. He proposed him </tags/to him/> the rescue in exchange for the capitulation and the acknowledgement of the right of the idea whose he served. The pride {muses} and the courage of Henry did not permit to him the agreement, in spite of raillery on the part of the mutineer the gentleman was convinced about the superiority of its own origin. The faith into the possibility of the creation of the new world, where people will be free, and simultaneously will disappear the all present evil in the old world is according to the Count a naivete.. Trying to inform Pancras that the revolution not at all will do away {will put to death} the general occurrence of the force and the injustice I – “saw all crimes of this world, dressed into recent vestments”. The leader does not accept arguments of the Count, because is the holiday convinced about this that is intended to liberate to him the people and to assure to him the happiness {good luck}. There feels qualified to the execution of great doings. The gentleman instead attends that the mankind became {remained} already saved two thousand of years ago. The disturbance of the divine order according to him, can be condemned by almighty. The conviction about the rightness of its own </tags/of its own/> sentence both the revolutionist, how {as} and the Count did not permit to come to terms to them. Both had at their disposal difficult to the beating with essential arguments. The aristocrat gazing intently into the coat of arms and the insult {picture} of his own ancestors, could not abandon the tradition for </tags/for/> the revolutionary rot. Then Pancras decided to use its own most firmer and also last argument, to convince the interlocutor. He exchanged {mentioned} many men {people} of the gentleman′s origin which acquired fame from their own cruelty in the face defenceless serfs, and also oskrżał of ancestors of the Count for the adultery and using of its own position for private advantages regardless at this with more poor people. Henry violently reacted hearing accusations toward his own Fathers calling Pancras with the middle-class-son, and ascertaining that without the mercy of his great grandfathers of peasants would touch still {yet} greater famines and pests. The manner of writing of the dialogue of representatives of different convinced spheres about the rightness of its own convictions evidences this that Krasiński perceived certain rights both in the position of revolutionists, as and the aristocracy. Bearing upon the all composition however, it is visible {apparently} clearly after which page {side} at last the author stands up. The interesting end introduces {represents} the interference of Highest into matters of people, because pervading revolution denies to divine intentions. The location of so unusual end permit prowidencjalne opinions of the poet who attends that the man has a free will and can do things both bad as and good, but to the border settled by {through} God. So also it became {stood} with Pancras who blasphemed against Christ and led {drove} human masses in niewłaściwąstronę, because also was blinded, and then dead by the God′s power. Zygmunt Krasiński originated from the gentleman′s state. Does not surprise so the fact that he opposed the total revolution, because with his sentence she could ravage the existing, secular cultural acquired possessions and instituted by God hierarchical order. “The not divine comedy” however, shows us his consciousness, what this this that considerably is guilty {viny} to this his state – the nobility which putrefying, degręgoladzie of moral and to the private interests provokes peasant′s masses and of middle-class to the mutiny which marks {means} the disaster both for one page {side}, as and for second.
More reviews about the Nie-boska komedia.-english