Of the countless religious sects and cults around the
world there exist a core of just nine major ones. These off shoots of their base sources often relate and identify with their "parents" yet differ in theology and philosophy to some degree. Of the nine base core sects, each has a Bible of some kind to spread their
words of teaching and inspiration. There is no debate Muslims believe differtly than Catholics or the Jewish. And there is no major problem with this happening. Zoroaster is as good as Buddhaany day of the week. What is upsetting is that sectular breakoffs use the name of God to promote and teach violence and civic upheaval is right and proper if done in the Lord's name.
In not one single page are the words "kill
innocent persons". No where in the teachings of Muhammed are any references to suicide bombing. In none of any of the world Bibles is slaughtering of innocent women and
children condoned or promoted. So where do these so called religiously inspired leaders get their information?
Men like Osama Bin Laden and terror groups like the Taliban imply their
cause is spiritual. Their cause is for the betterment of mankind. How does blowing up two skyscrapers full of
people with two airplanes full of people making for a better world? When does driving a car into an open market place with a car loaded with explosives knowing the damage it will do promoting peace? It is time man went back to the
real sources with the real teaching from the real masters. It is way too late to say nothing will change. It is Never too early to abandon these egoists and fanatics who will send out innocent men, women, and even children to sacrifice their lives for Their Cause, yet hide in desert caves or safe houses surrounded by body guards.
Real people stand up in public to promote thier cause. Cowards hiding behind the name of Allah et al use puppets. God did not design man to act like this. Who's words are correct? God's words, that's who.
More reviews about the who's words are correct?