Without knowing of what crime is accused to him, Joseph K., a bank employee with a good position, are arrested, only awaking, the day of his thirtieth anniversary. This arrest, but, will notprevent him to leave house nor to go to work. During the year that follows, Joseph K. will try to demonstrate his innocence and, simultaneously, to know of what he accuses himself to him. In order to obtain it will look for it aid in influential people, but its way to come will be clumsy and every time will be seen more immersed in a world that does not understand and that it navigates it, and guiltier to the eyes of the court. Finally, the night before turning thirty years, without showing a clear opposition, Joseph K. will be executed in a quarry by two twigs. Of this summary of the narration of the Process a denunciation of the cruelty and the irrationality of justice could be extracted before an individual, and of you incapacitate it of this defending itself. However, it is necessary to consider that this novel, although that in third person is narrated from the point of view of its protagonist, that is to say, the maximum involved in the subject. Therefore, we will have to ask to us if there are to understand the narration thread byranda, or must take a reading less ingenuous: looking for cracks and analyzing the reactions of Joseph K. and by those who surround it. There is similarity tome more adapted to praise/pour off me by this second option, which brings to think to me that the subject of the Process is you incapacitate it of a subject to find a place in the society, to know how to live as it hopes that it does it, and the fault sense that this causes to him. In order to reach this conclusion I have considered different questions. On the one hand, I have valued the fact that the novel and, therefore, the process begins the day that Joseph K. turns 30 years.
That is to say, when in general one hopes that a person must begin to have her place to the society. Until then it seems that Joseph K. had not noticed it in lack, at least not with as much intensity as to feel guilty -, was contented with a good work and visiting Elsa per week once, while Mrs.Grubach solved all the homemade problems to him. One of the other reasons that move away to me of a reading in which Joseph K. is victim of the power and justice, is the fact of not understanding the court like a real and outer court, but like an inner court, within the head of Joseph K: the conscience ofJoseph K. that on the one hand accuses it and by another one defends it. Of this way it would be explained that Joseph K. to the first visit knows to find the court with few data, or who, by example, the day of the execution is hoping the twigs without to be warned. To the 30 years, Joseph K. or has obtained a good position to the bank and he is proud, he wants to pretend that with this or has enough, but at heart knows that he is not able to integrateitself to the world, that does not know to live. This it is the conflict, the reason for which the court (its conscience) accuses to him. Therefore, it needs to find a place in the society. A way to try to obtain will be showing it to its validity from Literature, writing its biography, but the task will be impossible to carry out to him. Another way to try to justify its life will be by means of the women: the Bürstner young lady, the woman of the courts and Leni nurse.