What do critics have about this one? As in the article I’d rather have the roadrunner drop an anvil on my head than to endure
another research paper on
violence permeating the media- especially the one view with alarm tigers playful bowling over Winnie the pooh. But has as I read the Harvard report , I found that it offers a useful reminder: 74
animated movies made between 1937and 1999 and counting that categorizing that acts of violence, the type (comic or malicious) and wide variety y of weapons used from Mickey’s broom in fantasia to the swords in Mulan. Many popular animated videos containing violence that shouldn’t be emulated and scary scenes that young viewers need to have explained to them by adults. A seven year old but at four and without a parent to explain the law of the cartoon jungle. Kids ages two to five spend an average of one half hour watching videos each day, yet children up to five need adults help to process what they are seeing, children use stories to explore the feelings they can’t yet express. So critics stop wasting your time on unimportant stuff and take time to look at what movie makers making for our kids. Many parents assume that the Disney imprint and a G -rating on a video mean that a three year old can enjoy it. But almost every Disney film has violence they all have dark scary moment, for me parent should know every single frame of these films, just as they know every page in a story book. So ladies an gentle men please pay more on what our kids watch because in the future we are the ones who is to be blamed please don’t find excuses .