This is an artical which is created out of my mind, after observing movies fom my childhood(13yrs. old), that is from past 35 yrs. i watch movies from all the main languages which are popular, like hindi, tamil, kannada, telugu, malayalam, marathi, and english, many more foriegn languages.
I always used to feel like telling the concerned person, when there is an error in the making of the movie or acting, costumes and make up. In 70's 80's n 90's facilities were less to communicate with movie team or the public, but now its really good.
Today i thought of writing something on movies with the hope that it will really not bore or make anyone angry. there are few categories in appreciating actors. few are appreciated for their looks, few for their acting, few for their goodness(very rare), few for their scandals. but few are more loved and kept atop in the good list for no reason.
Aishwarya, to tell the truth is not a good actor and looks (i really mean) is also ok, there are so many others who really look more beautifull than her(like Priyanka chopra, who is always spoken about after Aishwarya),
Ash's dance is appreiciated more to such an extent that there is no other dancer like her, but the truth, she is an ok type of dancer, with more exagerating bends and expressions. many others look more beauitiful than her in the costume what she wears(which is created beautifully by designers). her acting in nimbuda movie is nothing less than over acting. i donot know how such actors come to the top, is it really by the people or the media or mere luck.
The othe rtop actor from south is Rajinikanth, u can call its absolutely his star and luck and later on his money talking. let us not talk or go to ther personal things, coz. it is their life. but we wil,l as a sincere movie buff with good taste, think over few points which are required to be an actor. looks--- not that good, now worst. acting---ok, if an actor needs just a few gimmicks to do on the screen, (like putting the ciggerate in the air and catch it in his mouth, telling some repeated dioalogues called punch diooloues, walking funnily), then there are so many in the industry who can becoime rajini. few were thee before Rajini's period who were doing such things, but were laughed at, then why rajini is a hit. he doesn't know acting, except for fight with camera tricks, and few emotions.this is again the media and luck.
Mohan lal is the other no acting actor, but very famous. if malayalees appreciate ok, because he is their actor, there is some meaning. but is liked and written about by all, donot know why. when I or anyone see him on the screen, we feel he is so dumb in some of the scenes, i wonder how he is been appreiciated by so many. for what. watching an actor and liking for that movie and not liking in other movie is ok, but putting them in every magazine for their acting and so many shows talikng about their acting as the best is little too much.
Many are attracted to these actors just by following the media. the media makes every wanted and unwanted news into larger than life news, which makes the people believe in.
In 70's and 80's actors like shammikapoor and devanand were appreciated more than real actors like Dilipkumar and Balrajsahani.
Devanand can be appreciated just for one reason but not completely as an overall actor. Shammi, for me is the most irritating person on the screen, a hefty man like him doing such an ugly way of dancing and exagerating expressions is not a person liked to be watched always. we can watch them in few movies, just for their unusual acting , but cannot be judged as the best.
Sushmita was more beautiful than Ash when they came into the industry, but why only ash. we donot want their persoal life, people like to watch them on the screen as real actore, beautiful and good at all the things what an actor needs.
I would like to continue and will be doing it in my next artical as a series. expect the next one with more interesting truth very soon.