Peer Review - The Newcomers - Perspective

Book Abstract by: PLoS

Original Authors: Mainguy Gaell; Motamedi Mohammad R; Mietchen Daniel

Not yet rated
Visits : 1
words:900
Comments : 0

The World Academy of Young Scientists argue that double blind peer- review will generate a better perception of fairness and

equality in global scientific funding and publishing

Published: September 13, 2005

Relevant Links:

http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&do ...

Please Rate this Review :

More in Biology

More summaries by PLoS

Add your comment

Translate

Send

Link

Next Summary

People who read this review also read:

Tags

Peer
Review

Tag this abstract

Use this summary

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

<div dir='ltr'><font size='6'><b>Peer Review - The Newcomers -  Perspective</b></font><br /><br /><strong>Summary by:</strong><a href="http://www.shvoong.com/writers/plos/" title="PLoS" target="_blank">PLoS</a><br />The World Academy of Young Scientists argue that double blind peer-review will generate a better perception of fairness and equality in global scientific funding and publishing<br /><a href="http://www.shvoong.com/exact-sciences/biology/1788253-peer-review-newcomers-perspective/" target="_blank">Peer Review - The Newcomers -  Perspective</a> Originally published in Shvoong: <a href="http://www.shvoong.com/exact-sciences/biology/1788253-peer-review-newcomers-perspective/" target="_blank">http://www.shvoong.com/exact-sciences/biology/1788253-peer-review-newcomers-perspective/</a> </div>

Copy to Clipboard

US offices: : Shvoong Ltd. 80 Broad Street, New York, NY 10004, USA

Rating :	1	2	3	4	5
Thank you for your rating