When scientists and physicists speak of the ‘universe’ they do not specifically state which
universe they’re talking about and this is a source of a great deal misunderstanding and conflict as I see it. There’s (1) the greater universe, or vast space, beyond our
Solar System, in which our Sun is only a small speck; and (2) the universe as it pertains exclusively to the Solar System. Scientists ought to be concerned only with the understanding of ‘our’ universe (the Solar System) as it directs our life on Earth. Anything beyond the Solar System is completely beyond our understanding and beyond our reach, and does not contribute one iota to life on Earth. The Solar System, and all its components, i.e. planets, moons and stars, constitutes a sophisticated entity and in the greater vast space our star (the Sun) should be regarded as an isolated system. The Earth itself, as well as its components must each be perceived as separate complex macro atoms, hierarchically ordered, with the Sun at the apex. Even though in reality it is not like that it can only be described in this way. All solar components provide in the sustenance of all
organic matter and life on Earth therefore was considered the ‘center’ of the Solar System before Galilei came along. Our Solar System can be compared to a ‘closed system’ in a
clear balloon, and every balloon has only a limited room for expansion. When it reaches the boundary, it collapses on itself. The solar boundary is an invisible, elusive mystery which no doubt exists, similar to the 'Iron Curtain' that divided post-war Europe, a perceived symbolical barrier. Further, when we consider that the nucleus of an atom contains the necessary substances essential in the process of heredity and is the directive centre of all the vital activities of the system, as in assimilation, metabolism, growth and reproduction it’s not hard to discern the Sun as that object of the Solar System. The Solar System ought to be
seen as a ‘closed system’ per First Law of Thermodynamics. The Second Law predicts the system’s
collapse as per ‘entropy’ (heat transfer) and the resulting disorder and chaos until equilibrium occurs; and the Third Law predicts absolute zero temperature as a result of the heat transfer coming to a halt at which time the Solar System totally collapses on itself. Before the heat transfer has expired a partial collapse of the Solar System takes place (per Uncertainty Principle) at which time things on Earth will also experience a partial collapse, – and this situation is rapidly coming upon us; thereafter the Millennium will commence. Paradoxically, we’ll not experience warmer weather in future, but cooler. Electron particles (in various looks and configurations) lose their energy and become victims of gravity – except for some selected ones. (The God-chosen!!) When you look at the organic destruction/extinction that is happening on Earth it is not hard to deduce that ‘particle’ extinctions of various organic natures are occurring. The Big Crunch theory alludes to a ‘singularity’ (a one-time occurrence) which all bodies suffering gravitational collapse must eventually undergo. The time reversed argument shows that any expanding universe must have begun with a singularity, the Big Bang. In 1951 the Catholic Church pronounced the Big Bang theory in accordance with the Bible. Considering ‘special’ creation occurred 6000 years ago and the 1000 years of the Millennium period is added we end up with 7000 years. As the Bible implies an end of the age at that time the cycle thus ends. The Solar System's variable components vortex into the sun and will form a black hole to be regenerated with thermal energy for the next cycle, – and a new Big Bang will occur again based on the principle that energy can be neither created nor destroyed in a ‘closed system’, hence the Eternal Return . The number ‘7’ is mentioned numerous times in the Bible and alludes to cycles, i.e. week cycles, but also alludes to other obscurities yet to be revealed. Maybe after every seven cosmic cycles something unexpected takes place, and who knows in which cycle we’re now. God knows! Let me know what you think it may be. Some people like to believe in an 'intelligent design' cause of creation, not by an undirected process such as 'natural selection'. Yet, I believe both processes are correct. ‘Natural selection’ occurs when we side with that aspect of nature that restores our confidence of survival before the end of the cycle (symbolically the fall season) from which an ‘intelligent design’ commences with the beginning of the next cycle (symbolically springtime), and we’ll be the players again with newly acquired wisdom searching again for our next ‘natural selection’. Consider this our purpose in life. Supportive words are in the Bible at Revelation 10:11, “Then I was told, You must prophesy again about many peoples, nations, languages and kings.” Invisible laws of nature are non-organic and do not undergo transmutation therefore eternal; while anything organic is subject to change. We mustn’t forget that we live in a mystery we need to take control of as ‘natural selection’ (survival of the fittest) suggests. Once the mystery has been revealed per 1 Corinthians 2:7 it will be to our glory.
More abstracts about the OVERSIGHT BY SCIENTISTS AND PHYSICISTS