This paper will argue for the approval of the pathos stated by Grant R. Steen in his book "DNA & Destiny". It will discover,
through
analysis, how this opinion can be justified within current scientific thought on the subject of Nurture versusNature within human developmental influences on human beings. Examples will be brought forth to help support how the author has made a convincing statement about the nature of human structure from cells to behavioral
sciences. The author seeks a balanced argument for DNA and the cognitive sciences, under the auspices of nature versus nurture and this paper will seek to prove that he is right in his analysis.