If all countries had the right
institutions, the world would be more peaceful, prosperous and just, but the institutions
considered "right" do not necessarily have to be democracy, human rights and free markets. Evaluating
international relations is difficult because each situation requires different
institutions; however, history provides a reasonable basis for analysis. History suggests that the correction or elimination of troublesome institutions would greatly contribute to world stability and cooperation, but recognition of the "right" institutions to replace them proves difficult and arbitrary. This essay evaluates American ideals for international relations. It questions the universal appeal of democracy and other "right" institutions. It uses historical examples such as the two World Wars as case studies to support its claims.