This paper argues that Descartes' "Trademark
Argument" can only be a sound argument if all the
premises are true leading
to a true conclusion; thereby, all the
premises must be 100% true and there is no
argument within an argument. The author points out that there is a problem in the first premise because Descartes says he has this idea of a perfect being but he doesn't mention anything else besides the fact that he has this idea of something perfect. The paper contends that Descartes' actually trying to prove that there is a God is just ridiculous because the author feels that God's existence is supposed to be based on a belief system; there are many religions held by many types of people in the world, and every religion seems to have their own God and own story behind how the world became into existence.