I find important to cite the source of where I removed the reasoning of that Immanuel Kant arrives at the same type of reasoning
that I had fond, twenty years behind. The heading of the book is "TWO INTRODUCTIONS To the CRITICAL Of the JUDGMENT", the Publishing company is the Iluminuras. It was edited in 1.995 and I wise person who the treatment that carried through was the same that Immanuel Kant carries through does not have three hundred years. The phrase that lí that it gave the certainty to me of that Kant arrives at the same conclusions that I are the heading of this abstract, and was read in 2.004, after to have had confirmation in the book of Arthur Schopenhauer translated into the Portuguese, aquí in Brazil in 2.004 - "the WORLD AS WILL and REPRESENTATION" that also it used of similar phrase and that it took me to have certainty of that the treatment that I carried through was the same that Arthur Schopenhauer carries through has one hundred and cinquenta years, and that nobody understands, therefore this type of reasoning goes to indeed increase the reasoning of being human being as a whole. I never had had science of such power! This type of teaching would have to be and possibly it comes to be, future, taught in the daily pay - primary, therefore it allows that the human being uses its onward behind brain, as the whole world makes and of front for tás as, until then, I never had had science of that he could be made. I made this form of reasoning has about twenty years behind. It perceived that all my brain if fortified, and that I never feel so great to be able.When I ordered the article with two treated half patients nor had the certainty of that the reasoning functioned or not. They were only two treated half cases! It needed to know if it had bedding about that it thought and it had as true or not, porisso I placed propaganda in the magazine "SEES" of that it made this type of treatment, what left furious the journalist of the "Leaf of São Paulo", that came me "to interview" with the exclusive intúito to destroy me, having later IDO to give science to the CREMESP to that I was to deal with something that still he did not have "scientific" confirmation, and that he gives to an interview the respect. When the journalist of the "Leaf" interviewed me, I had five treat patients. It asked to me how many patient he had treated and I preferí silence! It asked to me less - "than ten". I respondí affirmatively! Since then more I did not stop. My intelectiva capacity today is very bigger of the one than in 1.992, for the fact to use me of the brain of two forms - behind onward and of front it stops backwards. The certainty of that Arthur Schopenhauer had a superior mind to the one of Immanuel Kant is verifiable in its CRITICAL book"To PHILOSOPHY KANTIANA". It, practically disseca the mind of Kant and test that of it is sufficiently superior. As the heading of this abstract is ininteligível exactly today, for all the people who to come to read this abstract, are impossible to have had plagiarism of my part. By the way, the fact of my article to have been edited in 1.992 and the book of Kant aquí cited to have been edited in only 1.995 corroborate what I say. E, since the heading of the abstract to be inintelegível until today for all, I can warrant that it did not have the lesser idea of the meaning of the phrase, SAVED FOR WHO ALREADY BEFOREHAND KNEW OF THAT the PHRASE TRUE AGE! How no son of puta calls me quack! This phrase has certain addressing! It did not have the lesser idea of that it makes in 1.992, as well as for the staff of the APM, and only now, when I spoke in UNION Of the BODY WITH the SOUL, conseguí to call the attention all for what already he had been edited in 1.992. When I mention that René Discardings does not obtain this type of awaken intention still more the curiosity of the people. E when I say that this reasoning goes to potencializar all the minds, the "treatment" becomes still more attractive, thing that they had not known to evaluate in 1.992, in the APM. How the racionío of NIETZSCHE and supported by FREUD is false and do not deserves attention! It is not obtained to place the MORAL under guardianship of the DESIRE. The person develops a NEUROSIS! The treatment of FREUD "to accept" is false. Not true! Being the DESIRE in conflict with the MORAL, the DESIRE must be eliminated! Habitation does not have condition of co -. False therefore the GLAD DESIRE of NIETZSCHE. I wait not to have forgotten me nothing. I believe that the fact to have placed propaganda in the magazine SEES when still it was not certain if the treatment functioned or not, and in the intúito to have patient more to treat it can be pardoned, for the good that goes to produce to the race human being. Signs -
Magnus Amaral Campos