Charles Perrault, was first whom he included in his stories in 1697, the fable of Red Caperucita. The well-known plot, today world-wide, began like was custom at the medieval time of mouth in mouth. According to the caperucita story she was a girl of about 6 years, very pretty, and her mother had made him a layer red color and for that reason was known it like “Red Caperucita”. The moral of the story is intermingled, according to I warn, with a machista position of the creator of the story, that is to say, is tried to teach to the children, in this one case to the children, of the danger that meant to leave the tranquillity of its town and to go into in the forest where always they roamed so feared ferocious wolves, that in those times, they ate the ewes to them to the shepherds. The machista position that I notice, is that they let see as the irresponsibility of the mother lets go to its small loaded daughter of naivete, as it is logical, to take pastelitos to its grandma having to cross the forest where they inhabited those hungry wolves. All we know that a she-wolf went that it nursed Rómulo and Remo, consequently did not do damage to him, but they gave protection him, until they had force sufficient to develop.
Creator original of story surely is anonymous, soon Perrault and later brothers Grimn, that in the end was those that impelled the story universally, to such point that at the present time is one of the most read of the world; they gave a return of nut, because they were based on Perrault of 1867, and Ludwig him Tieck of 1800, recreating it then, with a happy end, since he appears the justiciero woodcutter that she defends the grandma; thus the story of the ferocious wolf and “Red Caperucita”, is a little less tragic and in spite of being a fable, also he is more credible. It is possible that the intention of the writers has been to diminish to the women, since it has happened throughout history; surely another one had been the story if it a fémina had written.