It worth noticing that the Systems General Theory as a Cientific Ontology is from Mário Bunge. The universy is placed as
a Master System, creator of the remaining systems that compose the reality.Everything cautiously studied present elucidative conclusions such as the necessity of feeling the presence of
complexity for the evolution and deliberation of solutions. The criation is only possible with the existance of internal and external conflict. Firstly external. The complexity is a human convention to explain the little understanding of what is explicit, but is nor perceptible. It is believed in the permanent evolution of the universe. Maybe the correct word wasn´t "evolution". If the stars disappear after performing a ertain
trajectory and time others arise, but keeping the same old essence. On this I see a glimpse the absense of evolution. There is pure and simply a mechanic capable of maintaining the system working without any damage. We can perceive the the lenght of an astronomical programming, vital to the sustaining of the universe. It could be in the same way as the human trajectory? Life with its creating explosion would have a a stablished time for its ending? Analogously we can accept as the previous answer the repetition of the complex systems over the systems considered simplest.I believe in the absense of a conclusive explanation for the cell stagnation. What is the link between the vital path of a star and the birth and death of a man? Even if there is digression in the understand of the discussed matter, remind that the existence of the complex system conducting all the universal gear.As Albuquerque states: "Maybe a cosmocentrism". "Our head is real, concrete and was born in this Universe", he declares.