I have no objection on
President George Bush s Democratic credibility as he declared war on terror on the base of humanities
values after 9/11 and announced a huge reward on Usama Bin Laden that understood a terrorist who established his terror on US civilians as
President of the State did that all as he thought was right.Usama Bin Laden is still alive and his force Al Qaeda is stronger than ever before as MI5 claimed recently in UK. President Saddam Hussein when he was presiding his nation punished Kurdish, as he understood that they are claiming a danger for Iraq as national as UK forces punished IRA in Northern Ireland over many decades as terrorist organisation who were also believing in separation as Kurdish did it demands in Iraq, Iran and Turkey.Democratic as US and UK condemned his practice and pronounced him a dictator and prepared a movement against his forcible status because he was only a person who challenged Britannia colonialism as British ruler splitted Iraq into Kuwait and Iraq. Germany was also departed into World forces after the attack of World War 11 into the obligations of the ruler ‘Hitler’ and it has been handed back to Germany the cause of European power as Hong Kong was reunited into Chinese territories. There was nothing wrong in Unity, as UK, USSR and US are the unity of states. If Iraqi president was willing to reunite Kuwait into Iraq but his practice was totally wrong. This process should be solved with peace process as China and Germany Governments did it with resolutions. If one country and two countries are willing to join together as European union is progressing, there is nothing wrong in such practice if a nation’s consent is positive. It is demeaning process to kill civilians as Usama Bin Laden did in US. If US President is doing for the safety and security of The State, why not others in the same process can do. I still remembered the statement of Foreign Minister of France that he delivered after British objection that he is opposing their attack on Iraq that President Saddam was holding Mass destruction weapons. ‘ France added that President Saddam has no Mass destruction weapons when you shall come back after attack on Iraq, you shall remember us’. President Saddam has or not Mass destruction weapons or connection with Usama Bin Laden, Every one knew that as US justified their action after one and one or many excuses.It is moral step to pursue any politician that delivers partial service against their civilians as Iraq delivered justice for ex president Saddam Hussein who killed
innocent Kurdish.After a defeat in Election as US president stepped down his team member that is proof of their failure action in Iraq. If President Saddam killed innocent Kurdish, Allies and US killed innocent Iraqi with their forcible manners. UN is not aware that can demand justice for civilians those were killed innocently in Iraq or Security council can raise such issues that if an action would be delivered for President Saddam why not others who killed innocent civilians. Perhaps US Public would not accept my proposal. If one dictator should be punished that why not others who killed only innocents after 9/11. What is difference between Usama Bin Laden and US President? Usama Bin laden did his action cowardly and US president delivered his action publicly.It has been proved that CIA formed Taliban to teach a lesson to USSR forces in Afghanistan. What is the cause that why Taliban are on State’s target because they supported to the enemy of state Usama Bin Laden and having innocent killing in their reward of support. US Admitted that Al Qaeda has their branches into various countries and many countries supported them as MI 5 Declared their strong connection in UK.If this Afghanistan attack is the cause of Usama Bin Laden’s support then why not other supporters are targeted?It is duty of every person who is peace lover to caste their opinion to demand from their politician to take an action to submit a newresolution in UN to secure world’s safety and security from world dictators as Saddam as US and Allies.It seems nonsense when Israeli authority secures their action to kill civilians as they did it for their defense. We need an international court and law that can protect civilians or they can claim against those states they are responsible to kill innocent or civilians especially children and women.We need to observe the circumstances to refer the base of security and safety that is necessity of everyone who believes in peaceful living so we can differ the dictator and democratic values.