As mentioned previously, in this sub-section I will go to deal with the “practical influences”, relative to my relation with
the writing and the reading. For in such a way, I will go to use itself of the same strategy of periodização used in the sub-section that it precedes to this, focusing, however, the ways according to which the norms
techniques and the styles of reading and writing had been for me internalizados, appropriate and externalizados in form of practical of reading and writing. In the first period of my trajectory, the
grammatical norms (even though had to the fact to be also treating to the beginning of my pertaining to school trajectory) still were in an initial process of internalização, as well as the externalização of one practical one of reading and writing (mainly in regards to the writing) was in an embryonic period of training, so to speak. The style with which I more identified myself was the literary one, and, it looked for, at this time, to supplant the ortográficas deficiencies and of logical ordinance of the writing, with it I appeal the expletivos resources, figures of language and other discursivos devices used mainly in literary compositions. In my opinion, this resulted in the externalização of “a hybrid” style, whose form (contaminated of logical and ortográficas deficiencies) was not adjusted to the content (which I intended that I was “original” and “interesting'') of the texts for me written”. In what he alludes to as the period of my trajectory, is correct to affirm that in this occurred the biggest learning of the grammatical norms, which had passed to be used with more severity in the writing. This to a large extent if had my effort in the direction to reorient practical mine of reading prioritariamente, focando books and authors who could improve my knowledge concerning the cited norms, as well as also propitiating an improvement of the quality of my texts in what it says respect to its formal estruturação. To this time, I started to look for to develop a more correct style of writing, however it must be distinguished that the literary style still influenced sufficiently in the composition of my texts, and, if of the point of view of its grammatical and ortográfica correction, part of the norms techniques of the grammar and the orthography already had been incorporated, in what refers to to the literal estruturação and logical concatenation them ideas, much had still to be made in what the “internalização of the techniques” becomes related and the “externalização of practical” of reading and the writing. I arrive at the third period of my trajectory, in this, in similar way what it occurred in the scope of the “theoretical influences”, can be said that the aspects that had more marked this period had been: ) the “internalização of techniques” of coherence and literal estruturação; b) the search of a writing style based on the attempt to take care of the imperatives of clarity, cohesion and coherence. In relation to the first detached aspect, it has that to stand out the basic paper played by books of research methodology <1> and techniques of 2 rhetoric <>, in the direction to supply the beddings to me necessary the production of texts with pretension to be clear and coherent, as well as equally make possible a magnifying of the reach of my possibilities of reading and understanding of academic-scientific and philosophical texts of matrix. Thus, in this stage, the development of a style of writing that has as base the search of a double perfectioning, either how much to the form (understood for imperatives of respect to the grammatical and ortográficas norms), either how much to the content occurs (especially in what it becomes related to the delimitation and the adequacy of the ideas to be worked in a text). <1> As example I cite: ALVEZ-MAZZOTTI. J. & GEWANDSZNAJDER, F. the Method in Natural and Social Sciences. Campinas, Pioneer: 1997. <2> As example of relative book to this subct, I mention: PERELMAN, C. & OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, L. Treated to the Argument: the New Rhetoric. São Paulo, Martins Fontes, 2001.