Search
×

Sign up

Use your Facebook account for quick registration

OR

Create a Shvoong account from scratch

Already a Member? Sign In!
×

Sign In

Sign in using your Facebook account

OR

Not a Member? Sign up!
×

Sign up

Use your Facebook account for quick registration

OR

Sign In

Sign in using your Facebook account

Shvoong Home>Arts & Humanities>Poverty Point Culture 8 Summary

Poverty Point Culture 8

Book Summary   by:likelyculprit     Original Author: Jon Ward
ª
 
All of the artifacts that have been described from the Jaketown site are thought to be from the Poverty Point occupation of the site. Radiocarbon dating has set all of these items in the 1500 to 600 B.C. range, which is around the time Jaketown was under the Poverty Point culture influence. The materials for all of these artifacts came from a variety of sources although much of the material was local. Other sources for the material included the Ouachita Mountains, the Ohio Valley, the Tennessee River, and southeastern Missouri. The only main difference between Jaketown and other typical Poverty Point sites is in the number and type of point artifacts found. The Pontchartrain points are much more common in Jaketown while Gary points are more dominant in other Yazoo Basin sites. And Ellis points that are also common in many Poverty Point sites are very rare in Jaketown. The other types of artifacts found at the Jaketown site are fairly similar to what is found at the other Poverty Point sites. Although the jasper items from the lapidary industry are fairly unique to Poverty Point representative sites. All of the items collected at the Jaketown site present evidence that the site was occupied for a good amount of time by a Poverty Point culture and the differences discovered are not enough to discredit this idea. Certain differences between sites are to be expected to location and other factors. In fact the Jaketown site is one of the most well represented Poverty Point site located in the Yazoo Basin. Many of the materials used in the construction of objects and tools lend strong support that Jaketown had a very strong level of trade. The novaculite and some chert were from the Ouachitas and from Tennessee, while the materials used in the lapidary industry were also imported. This clearly indicates that trade played an important role in the lives of Poverty Point culture populations.
Although these materials were originally just used for ordinary tools and objects, over time the materials gained through trade came to be used to make tools or items that represented a higher status. These objects made from imported materials were also of higher quality and were thus less common than the objects made from the readily abundant local materials. The trade network established at Jaketown and other Poverty Point sites had more significance than just supplying materials for construction of tools and other objects. It helped develop and stimulate a large social organization between different sites and people as well as unifying different regions of the Poverty Point area. Trade also provided a means of sharing information and innovations that any one group of people may have discovered and thus helped advance the Poverty Point culture in many ways. The Poverty Point site and the Jaketown site probably were involved in trade with each other fairly often. The Poverty Point site most likely served as a gateway to the Ouachitas for Jaketown and is how the Jaketown site got much of the imported materials used in construction of tools and other objects. It is these types of connections between Poverty Point sites that helped develop the Poverty Point culture and is the reason trade became such an important enterprise for the Poverty Point and Jaketown sites along with many other Poverty Point culture sites.
Published: August 31, 2005   
Please Rate this Summary : 1 2 3 4 5
Translate Send Link Print
X

.