With
the reason and against the law The beginning of the
civil disobedience,
created for Henry Thoureal, on
century 19, if it based where some
laws could be
disobeyed, for it if a law was
unjust, would have to be
disobeyed. John American Rawls filosofo in century 20, in its
definition of civil disobedience, places as being an act I publish not
violent that still aims at changes in one definitive law or in
governmental politics. This means that the person or the group of
people who adheres to this practises has conscience of that this
disobeying to a law, but she inflicts it for wanting to change it,
exactly ahead of the possible punishment. To expose this idea it is
necessary that the majority of the society considers the law in unjust
question, in the present article as example of civil disobedience, if
they find in the historia the case of Gandhi, against the English
constitution in vigor in Africa of the
south and India, and the racist
legislation of the south of the United States that in the decades of 50
and 60 was fought by Martin Luther King. Scientist politician Cícero
Araújo of the university of São Paulo clarifies that “civil” she comes
of civilized, what goes to opposes it of the armed one. The civil
disobedience only functions in paises that comprometen with the laws,
if not adjusting the dictatorships.
More reviews about the With the reason and against the law