The ontologia, as primate of the existence on the essence, does not interest here and now for nothing. What it is that we
know? We know that we think that we feel that we think. Thus, the same it is to
think and to feel and vice versa. Feeling aesthetic, that is what in them it occupies the thought here, was intuído by Kant, in special in the Critical one of the College Judging. Aquiline Ribeiro is a thinker of the aesthetic one of the nature. He will not be risky to affirm it. E, to join to the human feeling/ thinking of the animal-man, Aquiline integrates the animal-animals (and until the animal-plants), as beings of feelings, then of thoughts: "When it is transferred to the sight of these serranias, stood in the horizon, that have its what! of the monticulações of the creeps, full of peoples, passaredo, bicheza human being and montesinha, it takes us, of the projecção of our smallness on the immensity and the mystery of the distance, a feeling that as much can be of exaltar as to get depressed." Kant said who who in them steals the word, steals us the thought. Of fact, its capacity to communicate is the possibility that we have, still today, to try to understand its thought. Thus it is transferred with the writers, thus is transferred with Aquiline. The language is the oxigénio of the nature. Either through sonorous, visual signals or others, either through the articulated word, everything in the nature it is comunicante. In Kant, the primate of the nature on the art and the natural beauty affirms itself on the artistic beauty. In Aquiline, Also: "Of remaining portion, the Spring is a inigualável, enciclopédica painter, lady of one paleta that it is still for being born the impressionista group or the laboratory of chromes capable of supplanting." Kant affirms, in the Critical one of the College To judge: "To take immediate interest for the beauty of the nature it is always signal of good soul; e if this interest are habitual, at least indicate a disposal of the spirit favorable to the moral feeling, if of good grado if it associates with the contemplation of the nature." In Aquiline Ribeiro, the aesthetic feeling and the ethical feeling are not confused, but they comungam of same malga: the love for the nature. Urban Tavares says Rodrigues in the Génio de Aquilino, that Aquiline Ribeiro "is anticlerical free-thinker and, but an irrepressible atracção makes it to abeirar itself of the franciscanos. It is perceived. The religion of them is of love, not of punishment and, poor person of theoretical, confides all for the nature." He does not intend yourself here to accent the similarities between Kant and Aquilino Ribeiro. Kant was philosopher, Aquiline was a man of letters, a romancista, an accountant of histories. What it has in common is the respect for the nature and the men, dignified for an aesthetic, proportionate feeling for a favor of the nature. The life philosophy also will have points in common. But what it seems uniz them as the water to the cup, it is the intuition of the thought as feeling. E, in this, the nobility of the aesthetic feeling. Aquiline reason? Because he is a Portuguese writer, of century XX; because it is a hope, of that the aesthetic one comes to prevail simply for what it is - a interested disinterest, a thought feeling, a worthy form of life. For Aquiline, the nature valley for that feels, for that it gives and that deserves. The man, to be man, has of (if) deserving so great gift. In Kant, the aesthetic feeling allows to think the nature as teleologia. The same in it says them chats it poetical of Aquiline Ribeiro: "Given that we could measure the world for another toeza, another rooster in sings them. But our insignificância demands this pessoalidade of comensuração necessarily, donde results that the Spring, for example, is not a fenómeno with its ciclicidade of all independent of the individual, but one forms of its state of being. The roses have more or little in agreement perfume the moment of sensitivity of who inhales them. The Prado of a proprietor is always prettier than the Prado of the neighbor (...) If the man had eyes, as asmáquinas photographic, purely objectivos, he would enjoy for the world of invariable form, one alone tone, one certain alone forms, one alone gamma. However he is in the diversity of the retina that inhabits science: the good and the evil. Uniform alone the look of the angels." That value for the philosophy, while aesthetic of the nature? E that nature, as objecto or aesthetic paradigm? He will be this one (or) way to save the nature and the relation of the man with it? "THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT WORK THAT HAD BEEN DONE FOR ALL THE HUMANITY . THE UNION OF BODY WITH SOUL, THAT DESCARTES HAD BEEN FAILED . IF YOU UNDERSTOOD NOTHING , DO NOT WORRY. YOU NEED A TRANSLATER, A TRADUCER - I AM THE MAN. LOOK FOR MY SITE www.neurosehomossexual.com.br