In long history of Muslim, particularly in Indonesia, religiosity life marked with violence in the name of God. State obligation
to protect the rights and freedoms are not yet principled citizens realized. That is, religious freedom is guaranteed and principled republic this country since birth has not been fully realized in fact.
But in the Basic Law (Constitution) 1945 Article 28 clause 1 be I, is the religious rights of Human Rights (Human Rights), which can not be reduced in any circumstances. This right is strengthened again in the 1945 Constitution article 28 paragraph 1 and E 2, Article 29 paragraph 2, of Law 39/1999 on Human Rights article About 22 paragraph 1 and 2, Law 12/2005 Article 18 paragraph 1 and 2. In fact, the state also has established the Ministry of Religious Affairs (of the Ministry) to meet and uphold the freedom of religious rights / beliefs.
Although the constitutional rules and
institutions are state institutions, but not mean that human rights in this country are running well. Ironist, state institutions that should serve embraces religious activities from the (mainstream) religion, as it were, will have been changed to religious institutions. This organization is entering the area are very religious private, to impose misguided or not an understanding.
Role as the state determines not a perverted understanding and practice in Indonesia. While not an official state
religious actors, but only state officials who should be prosecuted just apply to people of any religion and belief. They are the bureaucrats who only served to serve the people who are, and not take religious practices. Countries only have the right to be a mediator and facilitator in the business or complete dissent, religious actors are not impartial.
For, be sure not a problem that must be in accordance with the "mainstream" or not, but with authentic awareness without being restricted by the formula and the formal legal. Although the various gain of obstacles that repeatedly, either physical or psychological, not all people will repudiate what believed as truth.
This is the lesson that can be quoted from the struggle of the Prophet Muhammad SAW in spreading message of Islam in the early period, especially when it was in the "country" Mecca. Although for 13 years to get tremendous resistance from the authorities, he did not stop spreading the message is believed. Even for the confidence, the followers of the Prophet and does not shrink from the majority of the weapons against tirani that impede the religious right, as recorded in the history of war Badr, Uhud, Khandaq, and others.
Nabawiyah history shows that he is only responsible for the tract of the Lord, without powers to force to other people. Wonder if the uncle does not own the most beloved Abu Talib, to be protective even when he be excommunicated people Mecca, not to end his life never being a Moslem. If he just does not power to someone, and why the followers now drag the person who does not congenial to the prison, and force the confession of faith with a variety of tools "power"?