With the footages shown how the
World Trade Center collapsed, it is very puzzling why it crumbled down like
a planned
demolition job. The planes that crashed into them caused fire on the uppermost floors of the building.
If it were a plain building fire and no planes crashed into them, would the buildings collapse in the same manner? Was it a design flaw of the buildings that caused it to collapse? If it was design flaw, then those who designed the buildings should be sued by the kin of those who perished because of the flaw! As with the plane crash in the Pentagon, it is very peculiar that the hole created was not what a jumbo plane crash would make.
Another question is, why there was another buildings alongside the WTC Towers that also collapsed, when only two buildings had plane crashes in them?
The theories stated at the web site documentaries are
well supported by photographs and illustrations . There are comparisons with other highrise buildings that sustained more severe fires but did not collapse because of it.
It is also a wonder why the debris from the World Trade Center buildings were not kept for further investigation to determine the cause of it's collapse .
The metals were shipped out to recyclers! It is a very suspicious thing and would easily collaborate with the theory's direction.
There are proofs, witnesses and experts that have a very strong point in the theory that the World Trade Center buildings did not collapse due to fire alone.
This again raises a
question on the credibility of the U.S. government in claiming that it was the act of terrorists. They may have caught the terrorists planning it and decided to let the plan go through but with their intervention to make it more catastrophic! The theories lead to only one conclusion.
You can read and see for yourself.
http://people. howstuffworks.com/conspiracy-theory3.htm