Rape backers and rapists constitute majority men
(Original Document contains 10550 words)
By Keerthi Kelegama (Abstract 899 words)
Rapists generally have the male sympathy. If female is picked up and raped, the natural tendency in male psychology is to find out loopholes in the case. Normal male queries, even by so-called intellectuals, are as to why did she walked in that ungodly hour or what was she doing at that wrong place. Women also have reasons to walk in ungodly times if their child is sick or a parent is sick, even otherwise, why not they have the right to walk in an ungodly hour as men do and be at places where they wanted. So-called intellectuals who pose such queries by implication admit that if woman walks during ungodly hour or found in a so-called wrong place, anybody is within his rights to rape her. And that is what happens throughout the world.
I have proved in this document that most rulers in countries raped women as a habit. Most of the kings of yore, had harems and the human rights of the inmates there, were trampled. It is a known fact, that former US President John F. Kennedy got then most famous actress in the world Marilyn Monroe killed before her addressing a press conference informing their connection. She died of massive drug overdose which was humanely impossible to take in meaning that the killer had forced them into her
This document features how Bill Clinton, a former US president, former Ugandan president Idi Amin abused women. Largest number of rapists failed to do so in their attempts, hence they go unreported.
There is a news item showing how Judge of the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka raped girls who came to clean his room. And why none of the newspapers did not report it and what difficulties I encountered in gathering facts about the case and how then Chief Justice of Sri Lanka did officially not come to know about the case resulting in covering up the issue. I wrote about it in my book: "Good bye Chandrika" which the president of the Appeal Court purchased (two copies) from me after making an appointment and it was his duty to inform about it to the Supreme Court. I think he would have done that unofficially but the matter was allowed to be hushed up. It was more a matter of prestige of the judges of the Supreme Court than making compensation to the sacrificial lamb.
Being an investigative journalist, I came out with a false story of how in my university days tried to rape a girl and let her go when she cried. I told this to at least 20 known top people to see their reactions. Thereafter 15 of them admitted that they in fact raped girls.
Also my book "Good Bye Chandrika" published some seven years ago insisted that women judges should hear rape cases because male judges are likely to be sympathetic with rapists.
India"s former Chief Justice and Human Rights Commission Chairman AS Anand (Courtesy: Hindustan Times) said in 2005 that the rape cases ought to be heard by woman judges and in camera to improve the rate of conviction.
Human rights and woman rights are trampled when the laws of Islam are implemented and interpretations are given. Mai was raped in Pakistan on the orders of the village council for some mistake committed by her brother. Due to international media coverage of her case, order imposed on preventing her from leaving the country, was lifted.
In the case of Imrana of India who was raped by her father in law, was prevented from living with the husband. Here too, more support for the rapist was found than for the victim.
Earlier, Village Council brought a argument that Imrana's father-in-law is 60 years old and therefore he was not capable of raping. Latterly, they brought evidence to show that there was a family dispute where father in law wanted to sell the house while the victim and her husband did not not want. Hence, through anger Imrana falsely implicated the father- in-law. If that was so, why cannot the father-in-law wreak punishment from the daughter-law by raping her. I vehemently refuse to accept that Imrana falsely implicated him through anger. It is relevant here to add that In briefing before the UN Security Council on Tuesday June 21, 2005 UN Humanitarian Chief Jan Egeland said the use of rape as a weapon of war was at its worst in eastern Congo and Darfur in Sudan. It means soldiers rape absolutely innocent women to wreak vengeance from the enemy. So why cannot angry father-in-law rape Imrana instead of arguing for vice versa.
In another more recent rape case, newspapers called the victim second Imrana, the Village council ordered the victim through a fatwa not to inform about the rape to the police. Victim's father also agreed to stand by the so-called fatwa.
India'a former Union law minister and rapist backer Ram Jethmalani has struck out at some members of the country's apex judiciary, upbraiding them for "intellectual inadequacy".
A month after Supreme Court upheld the conviction and life imprisonment of controversial godman Swami Premananda for murder and rape in April 2005, Jethmalani dashed off the nine-page 'article', expressing his "urgency and anguish". The ace criminal lawyer had defended Premananda right from the trial stage.