The Role to Russian Federation in
adjusting приднестровского
conflict , a part third TWO-FACED DIPLOMACY And CHOICE
to RUSSIA Third,
postlude of the investigation, shows on долголетние of the effort
managament Russian Federation to use приднестровский
conflict as
instrument of the pressure and influences upon Republic Moldova. To
date in Flint won the standpoint "hawk" russian politicians,
considering that Pridnestrovie it is necessary to save in persisting
form, as staging area for designing of power on SOUTH-EAST Europe. The
Results like calculation on person - it is necessary Russia? The Clear
forms of the russian trace Two previous parts of the investigation have
shown that приднестровский conflict was an unlaced industrial
nomenclature левобережья and was supported by reactionary part
managament USSR and his(its) power structure. The Command elected I.
Smirnova its leader, used the crisis an authorities in Kishineve, and
выдавила institutes authorities of the Soviet Moldova with левобережья.
Having Obtained political support of the Moscow and military - on the
part of soviet, became afterwards russian, 14-y Obschevoyskovoy armies,
industrial nomenclature левобережья has formed OSTK, and has
subsequently uncorded the armed opposition on Dnestre. Already at the
beginning initially 1992 Russia has rejected to conventionalities. The
Feather written scenario приднестровского conflict in Moscow have
alterred by sawing from soviet official in hands official new state - a
Russian Federation. At June 1992 artillery 14-y russian army has
crushed the aiming volleys on moldavian positions, caught Kishinev to
ask the world beside Moscow. As a result, July 21 1992 between Moldova
and Russia was signed agreement "About principle of the peace adjusting
the armed conflict in Pridnestrovskom region of the Republic Moldova".
Exactly this agreement was created миротворческий format, which exists
and hitherto, including inefficient and нефункциональную United
checking commission (OKK). Nefunkcionalinuyu, since OKK did not aim to
promote the real arrangement of a conflict, but only determination and
fortification of the checking to Russia on mechanism of the adjusting.
As a result this "surrenders" Moldova carried not only political, but
also serious economic losses. For more total picture, follows to note
that relations Tiraspolya with Moscow not always were cloudless though
цикличные of the voltage did not carry the затяжной a nature. One of
such period of the disagreement between managament of the Russia and
leader Pridnestroviya to appeared after October 1993. Then, armed
groups спецподразделений Tiraspolya have got up on side A. Rudskogo and
R. Hazbulatova, which have raised an objection to B. Elicina. As a
result this внутрироссийского of the conflict Boris Elicin
консолидировал its power. After Tiraspoli has supported the enemy of
the president B. Elicina, the last angry was voiced on this count in
russian массмедиа. Followed short period of the cooling the relations
between Moscow and Tiraspolem, soon ended. Already April 28 1994 Russia
has renewed the activity in process of the adjusting, having obtained
mentionings, in joint statement of the leaders of the Republic Moldova
and Pridnestroviya, about "intermediary activity to Russian Federation
in adjusting the conflict" and about purpose переговорного process on
production "state-legal status Pridnestroviya". The Deal Ilashku spilts
the light a Participation to Russia in приднестровском conflict and in
his(its) adjusting was not yet given special estimation of some
international judicial organ. But, in purpose given investigations will
useful note one of the decisions of the
European court on human rights.
At investigation of the Deal Ilashku and others against Moldova and
Russia from June 8 2004, European court on human rights were received
evidences on row fact. So in material is mentionned that commander 14-y
army major general YAkovlev were задержан moldavian power and was
accused in assistance to arms сепаратистов. After detention he has done
the statements, confirming interference to Russian Federation in
conflict and her(its) support Pridnestroviya. All evidences were
recorded on 10 cassettes. Though government of the Moldova this has not
confirmed, European court has installed as a result of investigations
that authorities to Russian Federation petitioned about liberation of
the general YAkovleva. Why managament of the Republic Moldova denied
and denies these facts? The Court has also considered proved that "big
amount of the russian cossacks waged war on side Pridnestrovskih
сепаратистов against Moldavian powers". But Alliance cossacks was an
organization, recognized russian power and his(its) relationship with
russian power structure does not subject to to doubt. The Same court
mentions the book Vladimira Polushina, 1996 - "General Swan-russian
riddle", in which "is presented ensemble fact, confirmed document that
Federation Of russia supported the приднестровских an сепаратистов". It
is impossible ignore and the other circumstance, which european court
has taken to information. According to material of the deal, in arrest
of the plaintiffs participated and person in the form with stripe 14-y
russian army. According to one of the proposers, his(its) quized the
person introduced employee of the russian counterintelligence, which
offered him liberty in exchange for confession that that is an agent of
the romanian special services. Otherwise threatened the death. Through
several days following arrest, the proposers of the suit have made for
commandant''s headquarters 14-y armies in Tiraspole, where their
subjected to the torture. In the document of the European court is
specified that "in its memorandum from 1 September 2003 Russian
government has repeated its initial position comparatively that that
Court has no jurisdiction in respect of these event in connection with
action criterion time "ratione temporis", and can not consider the
events 1992. For essences, they have acknowledged that proposers were
kept on territory 14 armies...".