But April 13 2007 deputy Gosdumy RF Nataliya Narochnickaya,
addressed to russian военнослужащим in Pridnestrovie with
word about
that that "russian contingent of armed power in Pridnestrovie - an
outpost to Russia on Dunaysko-Balkan direction". She has also
emphasized that "Russia for the last decennial events has forfeited
many геополитические to positions in the world, but first or last we
their shall restore". But separate such hard position to Moldova all
participants of the political process in Russia? Today obviously that
amongst russian политбомонда there is and politicians with more
moderate glance. Their attention concentrated not on method and
emotion, but on purpose and efficiency. In the opinion of посла on
special commission contracts MID Russia V. Nesterushkina, for Russian
Federation by ideal variant was obtain to Moldova was normal,
succeeding, and not artificially, but indeed - adjusted on-good to
Russia by country. Simultaneously, the ambassador Nesterushkin has
acknowledged the ambiguity of the opinions about Moldova and about
attitude to her Russia amongst politician in Moscow. He has assumed,
under existing interest to Russia in Moldova,
possible different ways
of the achievement these integer. But fight in Flint, around methods of
the advancement russian interest, lasts, reminding process of
перетягивания tightrope. In recently became very popular to refer to
precedent Kosovo, as on possible scenario and for Pridnestroviya. The
Present
investigation, showing artificial origin приднестровского
conflict, created methods subversive action, secret operation and
social инженерии, practised USSR during COLD WAR in country of the
third world, has confirmed that conflict is not an ethnic. This, вкупе
with that that fire to tension all these years was supported by
managament of the Russia, подпитывающим тираспольских leader economic,
political and military resource, does the impossible an use косовского
of the precedent in Moldova. Continuinging support Tiraspolya Russian
Federation calls in question her(its) status of the unprejudiced
arbitrator and her(its) abilities to actаas the go-between and
country-guarantor in process of the adjusting, creating unchallengeable
reason for change the format of the adjusting. During investigation
became evident that moldavian leaders will not sweep away to say for 15
years. In приднестровском conflict there is two sides - Kishinev, and
that, which planned, provoked, and supported the voltage of the
conflict, put the leader Pridnestroviya their own people, provided
their financial, economic and political resource, used its diplomatic
potential to freeze the permit of the question, and in every way
exerted pressure on managament of the Moldova, obtruding him its
decision, - that is to say Moscow. The Absence to boldness and will
this acknowledge only aggravate and remove the permit an
приднестровского question, since allow to Russia, closing
несговорчивостью тираспольских leaders (the russian people), manipulate
all process of the adjusting and avoid to responsiblity. Pridnestrovie
- brainchild of the Moscow, and, similars, the other decisions, than
confession of the real fact that Kishinev and Moscow are конфликтующими
sides, hardly exists. The Material of this investigation bring about
conclusion that Russia uses the conflict on Dnestre, and supports the
seperatism in east region of the Republic Moldova (Pridnestrovie),
since sees in this possibility to save its influence on Kishinevom. To
the whole this possible only note that Russia also could take into
consideration possibility of protection their own strategic interest by
by cooperation, rather then confrontations. Whomever can be shown that
power - an easiest way to reach the integer. But, as in this made sure
many попавшие in this trap, triumph from such victories always was
vremennym. ***** Dmitriy MYNZERARI, Semen NIKULIN, with participation
Vladimira SOLOVIEVAPresent investigation was organized at support of
the Danish Assotiation ZHurnalistskih Investigations