CONSTITUCIONAL LAW È CONSTITUTION: it does not have hierarchy differentiated between devices of the CF. Stony clauses of the CF cannot be invoked as superior norms in ADIN (direct action of unconstitutionality). è STF: it does not appreciate constitutionality on originary norms (constitutional or of the originary Constituent Power). è material Constitution: In the material Constitution, they appear only subjects that must be treated in a Constitution. What valley in the material direction of the CF is the content of the norms, that turn on important subjects for the State, as the Organization, rights, power, etc. è formal Constitution: certain norms of the CF turn on atypical substances, that would not have to consist in a Constitution. What valley to say is that the norms had been produced in formal process and consist exclusively of the CF therefore, and not it content of the norms, è rigid Constitution: not easily changeable, it demands special proceeding (generally written) è flexible Constitution: easy to move, for usual law. è Charter: for revolution, knocked down of being able, to the force. è Desconstitucionalização: norms of the revoked Constitution would be valid as usual law - valley in Brazil, saved if a new CF not to foresee express. è To be able Originary: limitless, illegal. è To be able derived (constituted): reformador (CF), subordinate, conditional. è Constitutions of the States: To be able decurrent derivative. It can be unconstitutional for the CF. è Limitations of the derived power: (it cannot modify CF) secular (after certain stated period), circumstantial (small farm, federal, prohibited intervention), materials (stony clauses - to abolish vote, federative form, distribution of them to be able and individual direitos/garantias) and procedural (3/5 each house for rejection) è Emendation to modify quórum of emendation: implicit material limitation - forbidden. è material Limitation: to abolish, to extinguish, but it can reorganize the stony clause without abolishing or extinguishing. è Norms of (CF) full effectiveness: law does not need or regulation, produces effect immediate - from there she is valid.
è contained Effectiveness: it needs law or regulation, but it can produce effect. è limited Effectiveness: it does not produce effect, only with constitutional rules è constitutional Validity: aptitude in producing effect. è Interpretation of the CF: some elements are used (politicians, economic, sociological, etc), not only the rules of the Right. è supervenient Unconstitutionality: it does not exist in Brazil, only tacit revocation. è Interpretation of the CF: it cannot oppose the proper CF. è Reception of law for the CF: deed of division and material è Emendation: plain exactly hierarchic of the CF è Unconstitutionality how much the form: total è Control of Constitutionality: judge or Court in the country è delegated usual Complementary Law//: è does not have hierarchy Treated international: level of usual federal law. They cannot make use on substance of complementary Law. They can be revoked by usual law. è independent Decrees: they do not exist, are unconstitutional for necessary forecast of law è usual Law: it can revoke law (if this complementary to legislate on subject of usual law) è legislative Decrees and Resolutions: they are not subordinated to the laws, diverse ability. è Federative Republic of Brazil: not secession, separatism. è indissolvable Union: States, DF and Cities. è Form of State: Federacy (Union, States and DF) è Objective basic: verbs (CONGAPROERR) è Beddings: SOCIDIVAPLU è international Principles: (INPREAUTONÃOIGUALREDECONSOCO) è Integration between peoples: Latin America è Extradition: not of born or foreign Brazilian for crime politician (he is not in the international principles). He depends on treat to extradition.