For the reason I personally still very to try to to well understand direction of
his article in this book, but from analysis of Dr.Khudzaifah Dimyati as editor in this bookmaking express " passing this book
Prof Satjipto try to explain admitedly and are there him concerning law reality" further said that in the eyes of Prof Satjipto reality punish in this time still strength and berkutat hold onto way of positivistik-normatif so that can degrade law science prestige.
Leaving of citation, I try to conclude that nucleus;core from this book is as according to his title " seeking, clarification and Iiberation", hence this book try to seeking how ought to punish that used, because in the reality punish to be used not in line with itself law hence having to exit of shackle of praktik law is which during the time played the part of, which aim to to get clarification of darkness or borrowed word of In response to idea of poured in this book, according to me to practice progressive law theory which developed by writer of itself, but I doubt of that thing, asked enable progressive law theory which on the market by can be applied in practice the straightening of law in Indonesia bilamama without dibarengi by a mass isn''t it to our criminal justice system?? because according to my opinion is straightening of law in Indonesia will very far from perfect word if/when have to await a word " sense of justice", good sense of justice of laws government officer of and society in general, possibly until era come near final will not reach, what ought to be is isn''t it system in criminal justice of indonesia in such a manner so that force perpetrators punish and society searcher of justice not to deed of which can of mencinderai process punish
HALTED. CROSSING PARAGRAPH LIMITATION.