Write and Get Paid
Use our content
Sign up
What is Shvoong?
Sign In
Email
Password
Sign In
Remember my username
Forgot your password?
Summaries and Short Reviews
home
Books
Biographies
Children's literature
Classic literature
How to, User Guides & Manuals
Mystery & Thrillers
Novels
Romance
Science Fiction & Fantasy
More
Internet & Technology
Blogs
Gaming
Leisure and travel
Mobile
News
Portals
SEO
Software
More
Movies
Action
Adventure
Biography
Comedy
Documentary
Drama
Romance
Thriller
More
Science
Agronomy - Agriculture
Architecture
Astronomy
Biology
Engineering
Mathematics
Physics
Statistics
More
Arts & Humanities
Art History
Arts
Christian studies
Film and theater Studies
History
Musicology
Philosophy
Religious Studies - General
More
Business & Economy
Accounting
Small Business & Entrepreneurship
IT
International Business
Marketing & Sales
Human Resources
Management & Leadership
Real Estate
More
More
Back
Law & Politics
Law - General
Criminal Law
Corporate Law
Constitutional Law
Politics - General
Contemporary Theory
Comparative Politics
Political Economy
More
Social Sciences
Anthropology
Communications Media Studies
Economics
Education
Political Science
Psychology
Sociology
Medicine & Health
Alternative Medicine
Comparative Medicine
Dermatology
Genetics
Gynecology
Investigative Medicine
Neurology
Nutrition
More
Newspapers
Australia
Canada
China
Iraq
Israel
United Kingdom
United States of America
Spain
More
.
Languages
English
Español
Português
polski
عربي
Български
简体中文
čeština
Dansk
Nederlands
English
فارسي
suomi
Français
ქართული
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
עברית
हिंदी
Magyar
Indonesia
Italiano
日本語
한국어
Melayu
Norsk
polski
Português
Română
русский
Српски
Español
Svenska
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Türkçe
Узбек тили
Tiếng Việt
Shvoong Home
>
Law & Politics
>
Politics - General
>
Brazil grants compulsory licensing for AIDS drug Summary
.
Brazil grants compulsory licensing for AIDS drug
Article Abstract by:
STDutra
Original Author:
Carlos Alberto Saedenberg
Summary rating: 5 stars
(1 Ratings)
Visits : 75
words:900
Comments : 0
This abstract was translated from
BRASIL QUEBRA PATENTE REMÉDIO ANTIAIDS
When HIV and AIDS were first identified, the desease was devestating and the patients, who suffered terribly, would not
resist for more than 18 months. Today, the survival rate is eight years, with a much higher life quality. Effective medication, researched, tested and finally made available in the market by the big pharma is the explanation. Labs are private enterprises and was a shareholders decision to invest their money in such type of research - as a result of the extraordinary returns they expected to have. Therefore, stimulated by the returns potential and the fierce competition, the engines of capitalism were put into work. If the virus, nevertheless, was to hit only the poorest countries in the world, the medicine would have not been developed, once patients would not have the money to buy them and
governments
would not have the necessary resources or would not be willing to spend fortunes on that account. The fact that AIDS can indeed attack middle and upper classes in developed countries was decisive for the big pharma to take on research. As a new drug costs a fair amount of money, there only will be private investment if there is market to provide returns. It is not mere coincidence that deseases and epidemics which hit only the poorest are those receiving less research investiment. An alternative path wold be public investiment - national governments and internacional organizations. Yet, it is not only in Brazil that the public sector tends to be less efficient and productive. Solution might be creating a new market, where governments or the World Health Organization were to stimulate pharmaceutical multinationals by paying a certain amount of money for vaccines on a determined epidemics. Another solution is to grant
compulsory
licensing, so other laboratories may produce copies the patented drugs. It is a restring pathway, once it grants access only to drugs already in the market and also hinders research by the big pharma. It is so much the case that international law states that governments can only grant compulsory licensing in national emergencies or extreme urgency situations. In what regards AIDS, solutions were laid down so multinational companies would offer discounts for drugs, according to a few established criteria, such as a country''s income level or the relative incidence of the desease. By trying to harmonize profits and social concerns, therefore, pharmaceutical companies must make money in certain markets so they can offer lower prices in others. Such solution works only. Hence, such arrangement only works if the deseases in richer countries pay for the misfortunes in poorest nations. Brazilian president, Lula da Silva, announced last May 4th that his government was granting compulsory licensing for an AIDS drug called Efavirenz. He also said that, if necessary, the same will happen with other drugs. Such measure was highy controversial, once it tried to fit Brazil, classified as a middle income country, in the international criteria. Nevertheless, Brazil''s decision is supposed to hold in courts, once worldwide we may find an anti-big pharma bias. Yet, President Lula da Silva''s speech was quite reproving, once he said that it is not fair for someone to get rich at the expenses of other people''s tragedy. It is not about that at all. It is about rewarding investiments. Something that the Brazilian government should keep on doing, once the country will buy a Efavirenz generic made by Indian companies - which are private enterprises, not charit organizations. Brazilians will not make rich the patent holders, but the oweners of the Indian factory - who can seel cheaper medications because they did not invest in research. And the Brazilian government states that it intends do further innovation within the local pharmaceutical sector. There are good laboratories in Brazil and first class researchers, but they have to wait for the polititians to define priorities and allocate resources. "waiting for miraculous remedies?", asks the article''s author, published bu the Brazilian newspaper "Estado de São Paulo".
Published:
June 15, 2007
Please Rate this Review :
1
2
3
4
5
Rating :
1
2
3
4
5
Thank you for your rating
More in Politics - General
Four Forms of Alienation
The Criteria of Modern Management System
Tragedy of tragedies
STRATEGY OF DEPOSITS OF PATENTS In the BRASIL:How to take one year more of protection.
Dirty Politics in the Philippines
Bangladesh will be a ‘Powerhouse’ in international market: The World Bank President
Most Popular
Add your comment
Translate
Send
Link
Print
Next Summary
Bookmark & share this post
facebook
twitter
delicious
more
People who read this review also read:
Aids in SouthAfrica
Antiretrovirals as Antimalarial Agents
Novel Drug Delivery System
The Dream of Access to Medicines for All
The Problem Of Drugs And AIDS
Moneycontrol/The Smart Manager
Tags
Compulsory
Brazilian
Licensing
Governments
Research
Aids
Drugs
Big
Money
Brazil
Tag this abstract
Use this summary
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License
<div dir='ltr'><font size='6'><b>Brazil grants compulsory licensing for AIDS drug</b></font><br /><br /><strong>Summary by:</strong><a href="http://www.shvoong.com/writers/stdutra/" title="STDutra" target="_blank">STDutra</a><br /><B>When HIV and AIDS were first identified, the desease was devestating and the patients, who suffered terribly, would not resist for more than 18 months. Today, the survival rate is eight years, with a much higher life quality. Effective medication, researched, tested and finally made available in the market by the big pharma is the explanation. Labs are private enterprises and was a shareholders decision to invest their money in such type of research - as a result of the extraordinary returns they expected to have. Therefore, stimulated by the returns potential and the fierce competition, the engines of capitalism were put into work. If the virus, nevertheless, was to hit only the poorest countries in the world, the medicine would have not been developed, once patients would not have the money to buy them and governments would not have the necessary resources or would not be willing to spend fortunes on that account. The fact that AIDS can indeed attack middle and upper classes in developed countries was decisive for the big pharma to take on research. As a new drug costs a fair amount of money, there only will be private investment if there is market to provide returns. It is not mere coincidence that deseases and epidemics which hit only the poorest are those receiving less research investiment. An alternative path wold be public investiment - national governments and internacional organizations. Yet, it is not only in Brazil that the public sector tends to be less efficient and productive. Solution might be creating a new market, where governments or the World Health Organization were to stimulate pharmaceutical multinationals by paying a certain amount of money for vaccines on a determined epidemics. Another solution is to grant compulsory licensing, so other laboratories may produce copies the patented drugs. It is a restring pathway, once it grants access only to drugs already in the market and also hinders research by the big pharma. It is so much the case that international law states that governments can only grant compulsory licensing in national emergencies or extreme urgency situations. In what regards AIDS, solutions were laid down so multinational companies would offer discounts for drugs, according to a few established criteria, such as a country''s income level or the relative incidence of the desease. By trying to harmonize profits and social concerns, therefore, pharmaceutical companies must make money in certain markets so they can offer lower prices in others. Such solution works only. Hence, such arrangement only works if the deseases in richer countries pay for the misfortunes in poorest nations. Brazilian president, Lula da Silva, announced last May 4th that his government was granting compulsory licensing for an AIDS drug called Efavirenz. He also said that, if necessary, the same will happen with other drugs. Such measure was highy controversial, once it tried to fit Brazil, classified as a middle income country, in the international criteria. Nevertheless, Brazil''s decision is supposed to hold in courts, once worldwide we may find an anti-big pharma bias. Yet, President Lula da Silva''s speech was quite reproving, once he said that it is not fair for someone to get rich at the expenses of other people''s tragedy. It is not about that at all. It is about rewarding investiments. Something that the Brazilian government should keep on doing, once the country will buy a Efavirenz generic made by Indian companies - which are private enterprises, not charit organizations. Brazilians will not make rich the patent holders, but the oweners of the Indian factory - who can seel cheaper medications because they did not invest in research. And the Brazilian government states that it intends do further innovation within the local pharmaceutical sector. There are good laboratories in Brazil and first class researchers, but they have to wait for the polititians to define priorities and allocate resources. "waiting for miraculous remedies?", asks the article''s author, published bu the Brazilian newspaper "Estado de São Paulo". </B><br /><a href="http://www.shvoong.com/law-and-politics/politics/1618920-brazil-grants-compulsory-licensing-aids/" target="_blank">Brazil grants compulsory licensing for AIDS drug</a> Originally published in Shvoong: <a href="http://www.shvoong.com/law-and-politics/politics/1618920-brazil-grants-compulsory-licensing-aids/" target="_blank">http://www.shvoong.com/law-and-politics/politics/1618920-brazil-grants-compulsory-licensing-aids/</a> </div>
Copy to Clipboard
.
Tags
Shvoong
Advertise with us
Link to us
User agreement
Contact us
Site map
Affiliates
What is Shvoong?
Blog (New!)
Summaries
Book Reviews
Movie Reviews
Best Sellers
Game Reviews
Summarizer
Forum
Report Violation
US offices: : Shvoong Ltd. 80 Broad Street, New York, NY 10004, USA