Search
×

Sign up

Use your Facebook account for quick registration

OR

Create a Shvoong account from scratch

Already a Member? Sign In!
×

Sign In

Sign in using your Facebook account

OR

Not a Member? Sign up!
×

Sign up

Use your Facebook account for quick registration

OR

Sign In

Sign in using your Facebook account

Shvoong Home>Medicine & Health>Effects of Different Propofol Induction Method on Cardiovascular Reactions Review

Effects of Different Propofol Induction Method on Cardiovascular Reactions

Article Review   by:TsingHua     Original Author: ACTA ACADEMIAE MEDICINAE HUBEI
ª
 
The cardiovascular effects of different management of propofol were investigated in order to find a more proper scheme of anesthesia induction with propofol. 22 adult patients, ASA grade 2 or 3, were divided randomly into 2 groups after premedication, Group A( n =12) and group B( n =10). Method: Patients in group A received fentanyl (2 μg/kg,intravenously) beforehand, then infused with propofol at a rate of 40 mg per 10 seconds ,paused for 10 seconds when the proposal dosage reached 1 5 mg/kg. If patients eyelash reflex disappeared, gave muscle relaxant, if not, continued to give propofol at a rate of 20 mg per 10 seconds until patients eyelash reflex disappeared. Then, gave succinylcholine(2 mg/kg)to carry out endotracheal intubation. Patients in group B were infused with proposal at a rate of 40 mg per 10 seconds until the disappearing of eyelash reflex and infused with succinylcholing(2 mg/kg) to finish endotracheal intubation. Endotracheal intubation was carried out 2 minutes after the infusion of proposal in all groups.HR, SBP, MAP and DBP were continuously observed and were respectively recorded at the time of preinduction(T 0), 1 min(T 1) and 2 min (T 2) after the infusion of propofol, the moment of endotracheal intubation(T 3) and 3 min after intubation(T 4), RPP (rate pressure product) was calculated to indirectly reflect heart oxygen consumption.
Result: HR, SBP, MAP, DBP and RPP did not significantly changed after induction in group A.However, HR gradually increased in group B after induction, and significantly higher than its preinduction value( P <0 05). Also, the RPP values at T 3 and T 4 were both higher than its T 0 value ( P <0 01)in group B.Conclusion: Giving Fentanyl(2 μg/kg) in advance and then infusing propofol interruptedly at differtent rate can fully inhibit cardiovascular side effects of endotracheal intubation, reduce heart oxyen consumption and dont cause significant preintubation hypotension. Therefore, it is an ideal propofol induction method.
Published: January 25, 1997   
Please Rate this Review : 1 2 3 4 5
  1. Answer   Question  :    who is author of this article and puplished in which journal? View All
  1. Answer   Question  :    who is author ò thí article? View All
Translate Send Link Print
X

.