Search
×

Sign up

Use your Facebook account for quick registration

OR

Create a Shvoong account from scratch

Already a Member? Sign In!
×

Sign In

Sign in using your Facebook account

OR

Not a Member? Sign up!
×

Sign up

Use your Facebook account for quick registration

OR

Sign In

Sign in using your Facebook account

Shvoong Home>Medicine & Health>The Debate over Placebo-Controlled Trials Review

The Debate over Placebo-Controlled Trials

Book Review   by:PLoS     Original Author: Miller Frankllin
ª
 
Turner and Tramr provide a cogent argument in favor of the ethical use of placebo controls despite proven effective treatment . However, they are wide of the mark citing the APPROVe trial in support of their position. Because there is no established treatment to prevent adenomatous polyps, few commentators would have any objections to the use of placebo controls in this study. Nevertheless, they are right to suggest that it would have been desirable to have included a placebo control in the VIGOR study to provide a more rigorous assessment of safety. Whether, all things considered, a placebo control would have been ethical in this study of treatment for rheumatoid arthritis is debatable.

Another issue not discussed in this PLoS Medicine Debate is the value of placebo controls in early proof of concept efficacy trials, despite the existence of established treatment. The efficiency of seeking a rigorous efficacy signal before moving on to larger-scale trials (and exposing as few subjects as possible to drugs that might not work or turn out to be toxic) is a valid ethical reason for using placebo controls, provided subjects are not exposed to undue risks of harm from withholding established treatment .
Published: June 28, 2005   
Please Rate this Review : 1 2 3 4 5
Translate Send Link Print
X

.