The article on Wikipedia should be an eye-opener to other
web sites that charge for
information that normally could be found on books, magazines or libraries. Those web sites take advantage of people who lack the mobility or access to information. There are a lot of students who seek information on the internet to save on time, avoid queues and the hassles of other information resources.
Wikipedia and the contributors should be cited more often in public just like Newsweek did. Had it not been for Newsweek, I would not have known the gallant deed of Jimmy Wales. Truth is, I never logged in on Wikipedia because I thought it was one of those web sites that would give a hint of information then charge you for the whole information needed. This is specially so if you are searching for medical information. Most of the time these web sites
provide links where full and detailed information will be available for a price.
It is of no surprise that Wikicities was launched for income purposes. Wales would really
need all the finances he could get to provide a source of free information. It is mind boggling to think that he has only a
staff of three to cater to the millions seeking information and for the number of contributors unselfishly
providing the bulk of data. And in over 200 languages and different scripts, how could a staff of three make sure that information is translated correctly?
For those readers who have donated $1 million to the cause of Wales, it is very commendable. Same is true for Yahoo providing servers and $250,000.00! Wikipedia can be compared to the wild where food is in abundance for the dwellers. I hope that those who get information in Wikipedia take only what they need. It is also hoped that the rights of Wikipedia is protected and not violated by unscrupulous web site owners.
More reviews about the Newsweek