.
Hang lack at level pre scholastic in the Mexican educational system
National Recognize the deficiencies SEP in covertures By : Ladislao
Jiménez-Benavides, Wednesday, August 15, 2007 Hang lack at level pre scholastic in the Mexican educational system Mexico (The news of the Monterrey City). - The educational situation at level preschooler can not be worse recognizes the Public Education Secretariat (SEP) since: there is no sufficient master, the groups are saturated, increases the inequality in the service, the work of the supervisors is duplicated by the growth disproportionate of the schools and it has not been complied with the obligatorily of offering education preschooler to all the children of 4 to 5 years. Specialists, officials and even educational authorities have outlined in various opportunities the need from eliminating the obligatorily from the first degree from preschooler. This situation will be aggravated when it will be obligatory the first degree of preschooler. The National Institute for the Evaluation of the Education, in its inform "The Quality of the Basic Education in Mexico 2006", made a call to reconsider the universal and obligatory education goal for the 3-year-old children. On August of 2008, when it will be obligatory the first degree of preschooler, it will be needed 60 thousand 433 additional teachers to attend to all the children that may have an age from among 3 and 5 years. In the Deputies Chamber (Representants Chamber), during the analysis Workshop on educational Matters, the director of the National Education Institute (INEE), in its report "The Quality of the Basic Education in Mexico 2006", they made a call to reconsider the universal and obligatory education goal for the children of three years. On August of 2008, when it will be obligatory the first degree of preschooler, it will be needed 60 thousand 433 additional teachers to attend to all the children that may have an age from among three and five years old, indicates the report. We can say that, if a kid does not is going to first of preschooler, it is not terrible, but if a 13-year-old kid goes in the street instead of be in the school if it is terrible and furthermore we consider that the massive number of the kids of the level preschooler of teaching gives as a result a poor quality service and not equitable. We see that before the lack of new spaces and of sufficient educational personnel, they exist a whole slew of groups, particularly in marginalized urban and urban zones, where the number of pupils is greater to 35 and in some instances groups of up to 50 children. Criticize duty of carrying to the children to study level preschooler for law From 2004 in which came into effect the obligation of studying the third year of preschooler, the Citizen Observatory of the Education has indicated the need of abolishing the first year of preschooler, due to the fact that Mexico is the only one country in the world that made obligatory the three years of preschooler. Indicate that an important proportion of the accelerated growth of the enrollment is due to that the number of facilities of the private service grew 92 percent. To this scholastic facilities growth, the enrollment of education facilities public by therefore will grow more than the number of schools. Finally the SEP, assures that the current situation in the one which operates the level preschooler demand that is widened the term to comply with the obligatory revenue for the children of three years and to guarantee the high-priority attention to the children with ages between four and five years old. However The Specialists Council for the Educationof the SEP, in their report "The challenges of Mexico in the future of the Education in Mexico" recommended to eliminate the obligatorily from the first degree from preschooler, the same as the external appraisers of the Reform Program Preschooler What we added is that the legislators instead of imposing the obligatorily of the level of three years of preparatory that they are fixed in the children of 3 to 5 years. We observe that it is not terrible for a child of three to five years that they aren’t to go to the school but if you are a teenager of 16 to 19 years and they go to the street instead of they are in the school if it is terrible and horrid. It being that the kids of 16 to 19 years old is those which would have to observe, so that the education would be integral. To all this seems be that Mexico is the only one country in the world that compels to these children to go to the school but to the adolescents despises them the Mexican educational system. In this attitude of the Mexican legislators we observe little or void fondness toward the children of 3 to 5 years, since the legislators want to see them in the jail, pardon in the school being that so small child should be cared by their mothers and they wanted in house. Such is as we see to our legislating fools and they having to children not wanted in house. That few imagination and love of our congressmen. ( Mural, Nacional, p. 7, August 07, 2007)www.elregio2.blogspot.com
Published: September 07, 2007
More summaries by lalo jimenez
More